"We're looking into the financial nature. Did this expenditure violate policies and procedures? Were any other laws broken?" State Auditor Joseph Maestas said.
“1. The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming the action of the Ld. AO in disallowing exemption of Rs.10,67,766/- u/s. 11 of the Act.
Santosh S/o Domaji Bhandarkar, a proprietor of a business providing manpower and security services, approached the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of his application under the Sabka ...
The New York-based financial giant provided inaccurate tax advice to customers and potential customers on wire products primarily marketed at small and mid-size businesses, federal prosecutors ...